Back to dataset
National Archives Customer Feedback and ComplaintsCustomer Feedback and Complaints - Jan 2015
You're previewing the first 4 rows of this file.
Download this fileJanuary 2015 - The National Archives - Complaints | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Summary of Complaint | How received | When Received | Case ref | Background Information | Action taken and response to complaint |
Customer ordered copies of photographs. Images ordered had faces 'redacted'. Customer was dissatisfied with quality of redaction and requested a refund | 8.1.15 | 7762 | Copies of records can be ordered through our Record Copying Service | The photos had been redacted at the time of creation, and there was supporting evidence that demonstrated that this was a prerequisite for access to the subject matter. We explained this to the complainant and had the Discovery descriptions updated to inform users that some records had been redacted. | |
The complainant received records advice from our Enquiry Service and then visited. The records ordered did not contain the information as suggested, and the customer felt this was a wasted visit | 21.1.15 | 7845 | Users can contact our staff using a number of different contact options to gain advice and guidance on visiting and researching at The National Archives | We apologised for any misunderstanding and offered detailed advice on the complainant's specific research subject, so that they could progress their research, elsewhere at institutions. | |
The complainant downloaded a Royal Navy service record and was not satisfied with the level of detail contained in the record - requested a refund | 24.1.15 | 7863 | Offsite users can search our Digital Downloads Service to locate and download digital copies of our records on payment of fee | We offered detailed records advice and supplied links to where further information could be located. No refund was authorised as the record was complete and was of good quality. |